It was a grand attempt to bring some integrity to what so many consider a task more important than any regular trial of any consequence. Unfortunately, like this entire mess, logic, rules of law, jurisprudence and honor were thrown out with the want ads.
I agree 100%. Roberts sides with the leftists once again and abuses his office and abuses his power by refusing to read that question. The very idea that no one is able to say the name "Ciaramella" is absolutely ridiculous, and not even covered by this statute. what a joke. I have a love/hate going with Rand Paul, but in this case he is fighting the good fight.
It was a grand attempt to bring some integrity to what so many consider a task more important than any regular trial of any consequence. Unfortunately, like this entire mess, logic, rules of law, jurisprudence and honor were thrown out with the want ads.
ReplyDeleteI agree 100%. Roberts sides with the leftists once again and abuses his office and abuses his power by refusing to read that question. The very idea that no one is able to say the name "Ciaramella" is absolutely ridiculous, and not even covered by this statute. what a joke. I have a love/hate going with Rand Paul, but in this case he is fighting the good fight.
ReplyDeleteAgree 100%
DeleteWe sure need another one on the SC to counter Roberts. Amy Barret seems like a good choice to replace Ruth Buzzi.